Arizer has long been one of the most respected names in the vaporizer industry. Known for reliable build quality, smooth vapor, and glass pathways that preserve flavor, their devices often rank among the best options for both casual and seasoned cannabis consumers.
In this review, I put two of Arizer’s most talked-about products head-to-head: the Arizer XQ2, a feature-packed desktop vaporizer, and the Arizer Solo III v2.0, the portable update to their classic Solo line. I tested both extensively, focusing on ease of use, vapor quality, and everyday practicality.
Table of contents
Arizer XQ2 Review — The Desktop Powerhouse
Overview
The Arizer XQ2 is designed as a true all-in-one desktop vaporizer. It caters to users who want versatility and don’t mind being plugged into a wall outlet. Unlike simple portable vapes, the XQ2 offers multiple inhalation methods: whip, balloon/bag, and even an aromatherapy mode. It’s very clearly Arizer’s answer to devices like the Volcano, but with a slightly friendlier price tag and extra flexibility.
Technical Specs
- Heating: Convection with a ceramic heater for consistent and even vaporization.
- Temperature Range: Fully adjustable with precise digital control.
- Session Modes: Three fan speeds; supports bag and whip use.
- Accessories Included: Remote control, balloon bags, whip system, and an aromatherapy dish.
- Power Source: Plug-in desktop unit, not designed for portability.
User Experience & Performance
One of the biggest things that stood out about the XQ2 was how easy it was to use. The controls are intuitive, the LED display is clear, and switching between whip and bag mode only takes seconds.
Cleaning was also refreshingly simple. Since most parts are glass, a quick soak in isopropyl alcohol had everything looking brand-new in no time.
Flavor quality was top-tier. Using the balloon system, I got dense, aromatic vapor that rivaled anything I’ve experienced from higher-priced desktops and really preserved the terpenes that every strain has. The aromatherapy dish was a nice surprise, too. I tested it with dried lavender (which was included!), and the fragrance easily filled the room.
Where the XQ2 really shines is in group settings. Passing around a balloon or sharing a whip among friends was effortless, and it never felt underpowered.
Personal Impressions
To put it simply: the XQ2 is a beast. It’s versatile, produces excellent vapor, and works just as well for a solo session as it does for a full living-room circle. I personally enjoyed it more than the Solo III, largely because of the flavor quality and variety of usage modes.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Multiple inhalation methods (bag, whip, aromatherapy)
- Excellent flavor and vapor density
- Easy to clean with glass components
- Perfect for group use
Weaknesses:
- Not portable; requires outlet power
- Takes up space compared to a handheld vape
Arizer Solo III v2.0 Review — The Portable Workhorse
Overview
The Solo III v2.0 is Arizer’s latest portable upgrade, designed for users who value mobility but still want the flavor and quality that glass vapor paths are known for. It’s meant to be the go-to choice for solo sessions, travel, or anyone who doesn’t want to lug around a desktop setup.
Technical Specs
- Heating: Hybrid convection/conduction system.
- Temperature Range: Precision control across a wide spectrum.
- Heat-Up Time: Under a minute.
- Battery: Long-lasting rechargeable lithium-ion, charges via USB-C.
- Accessories: Glass aroma tubes in standard and XL sizes, plus a water pipe adapter.
- Portability: Handheld but slightly heavier than expected.
User Experience & Performance
The Solo III is incredibly straightforward to use, even easier than the XQ2. Pop in a glass aroma tube, set your temperature, and you’re ready to go. Cleaning was equally painless; glass stems pop out for quick maintenance.
However, I wasn’t blown away by the vapor flavor. Using the same settings as I did on the XQ2, the taste came out flat. It’s possible that the Solo III requires different temperature settings to really shine, but in direct comparison, it didn’t measure up in terms of aroma or richness.
That said, portability is where the Solo III shines. It’s heavier than I expected but still perfectly manageable for travel or discreet use. I also appreciated the option to attach it to a bong, essentially turning it into a portable bowl.
Personal Impressions
While I found the Solo III less impressive than the XQ2 in terms of taste, it’s still a solid portable. The ease of use and bong compatibility are standout features. It just doesn’t have the versatility or flavor payoff of its desktop sibling.
Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths:
- Extremely user-friendly
- Portable design with long battery life
- Easy to clean
- Bong attachment option
Weaknesses:
- Flavor not as rich as the XQ2
- Less versatile overall
- Slightly heavy for a portable vape
Side-by-Side Comparison
Who Should Buy Which?
- Get the XQ2 if:
- You often smoke with other friends.
- Flavor quality is your top priority.
- You want versatile modes (bag, whip, aromatherapy).
- You often smoke with other friends.
- Get the Solo III if:
- You need a reliable portable vaporizer for solo use.
- You want a bong-compatible vaporizer.
- Portability outweighs versatility in your setup.
- You need a reliable portable vaporizer for solo use.
Pricing & Value
Both devices fall into the mid-to-premium range for vaporizers, but they’re priced competitively compared to others in their class. The XQ2 comes with more accessories out of the box, while the Solo III offers better portability and modern USB-C charging.
Arizer also provides solid warranty coverage, which makes both units a good long-term investment for most cannabis consumers.
As a reader of The HighWay, you also get 20% off on Arizer products using code THEHIGHWAY20 at checkout, so don’t miss out!
Our Findings
After testing both, my personal favorite is the XQ2. It’s versatile, powerful, and delivers consistently excellent vapor flavor. I especially loved the bag system, which reminded me of the Volcano but with even more flexibility.
The Solo III v2.0, while convenient and portable, didn’t impress me as much in the flavor department. That said, it’s still a great choice for anyone who prioritizes portability and wants an easy-to-clean, bong-compatible vaporizer.
In short:
- XQ2 = best for home and group use.
- Solo III = best for solo sessions and portability.
Either way, Arizer continues to deliver reliable, high-quality vaporizers that are built to last.
Don’t miss out on all the other products we have reviewed here at The Highway like THC Drinks, cannabis infusers for edibles, LED lights for growing cannabis, and more!
Join us on The HighWay.
Leave a Reply